Patience Kwagala2024-06-172024-06-172024-06-12https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12311/1569The study focuses on the ADR mechanisms and their efficacy in Uganda, taking into account the many techniques of conflict resolution, development, and evolution in Uganda, including traditional strategies of resolving disputes, that have led to the resuscitation of ADR, as well as its benefits and challenges. The study also examines the various types of ADR that can be used by parties and the government to resolve disputes. Chapter One of my research will look at the proposal entailing the most significant writers that stood out for me during my research. The many forms of alternative dispute resolution, such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration, will be covered in Chapter Two of this study along with the benefits and drawbacks of ADR in Uganda. It will also cover the main points of my research, which is to demonstrate that arbitration is the most effective alternative dispute mechanism in Uganda for resolving conflicts. Additionally, I will compare arbitration to all other dispute resolution techniques, such as negotiation, mediation, and conciliation, and demonstrate its superiority over these approaches. The non-legal features of Adr, such as the ATS, will be covered in Chapter Three of this study along with their global, regional, and, finally, Ugandan contexts. The legal aspects of alternative dispute resolution in Uganda, as well as those worldwide and some relevant case law, will be examined in Chapter Four of this study. Chapter Five will conclude with an examination of my conclusions and suggestions for enhancing Uganda's ADR processes.enDissertation