The impact of symmetric diplomacy on corporate strategy and governance in Uganda–U.S relations
| dc.contributor.author | Alliyah Daniella Gordon Sworo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-22T11:25:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-22T11:25:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05-08 | |
| dc.description | Undergraduate | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines how the asymmetrical diplomatic operations can influence the cooperative result between Uganda, which is a powerful player in East and Central Africa, and the United States, the most powerful country in the world. Though there are distinct differences in economic, military, and institutional capabilities that define the bilateral relationship, the asymmetry has not always triggered unquestioned adherence or absolute subordination. Through the application of the asymmetric interdependence theory, power transition theory, and neoclassical realism, the manuscript hypothesises that Uganda has undertaken a constrained agency under the provisions of structural constraints. Kampala has attempted to gain concessions, contain external pressure, and maintain policy autonomy through strategic employments such as issue-linkage, coalition-building in regional and multilateral fora, and selective normative positioning. The analysis has four sections. The introductory chapter presents the theoretical and conceptual framework on which the study is based. In the second chapter, the author attempts to trace the development of Uganda-US relations from 1962, when Uganda gained independence, through the end of the Cold War. Chapter three examines trends in cooperation and contestation in the post-Cold War and post-9/11 periods, with a specific focus on security and development relations. The last chapter offers a critical assessment of the modern dynamics, including the emergence of economic diplomacy and the controversial nature of legislation on LGBTQ+ rights. The results suggest that structural power asymmetries are not the only factors affecting cooperative outcomes; they also include the strategic interests of Uganda vis-à-vis Washington, the effects of domestic political constituencies in both nations, and the overall international environment. The paper contends that asymmetric diplomacy does not lead to direct subjugation but to negotiation, contingency, and, at times, reciprocity, which are valuable to small and middle-power states negotiating with the world superpowers. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12311/3374 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Uganda Christian university | |
| dc.title | The impact of symmetric diplomacy on corporate strategy and governance in Uganda–U.S relations | |
| dc.type | Dissertation |