THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLES ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: A CASE OF SIKYOMU DEVELOPMENT

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2025-09-18

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Uganda Christian University

Abstract

The study aimed at examining the effect of leadership styles on employee performance in nonprofit organizations: a case of Sikyomu Development. It specifically focused on; examining the relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance, establishing the relationship between autocratic leadership and employee performance, and exploring the relationship between laissez-faire leadership and employee performance in Sikyomu Development. The study was conducted utilizing a cross-sectional study design, with both quantitative and qualitative research methods used. Data was obtained by questionnaires and interviews, and both basic random and selective sample approaches were used. The study also included a sample size of 40 respondents who are top management and lower-level employees of Sikyomu Development. The study findings revealed that transformational leadership enhances workers' performance and motivation at Sikyomu Development Organisation (r = .644**, p < .05) by encouraging individual recognition, participation in decisions, vision, teamwork, and innovation. In contrast, autocratic leadership lowers performance (r = -.556**, p > .05) according to over-controlling, low communication, and reduced employee autonomy, even though it offers quick decision-making and oversight for lower-skilled workers. Laissez-faire leadership had a generally positive but multi-faceted effect on performance (r = .623**, p < .05), since providing autonomy and decisionmaking freedom enhances independence, self-confidence, and innovativeness among selfmotivated employees, but ambiguity and inconsistent performance among less regimented employees. Finally, the study recommended the need for Sikyomu Development to enhance transformational leadership, reduce overreliance on authoritarian methods, use laissez-faire leadership with caution and guidance, establish leadership programs, and implement systematic feedback and appraisal systems to promote employees' motivation, creativity, accountability, and overall performance.

Description

Undergraduate Research

Keywords

Citation